Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
int64
1
50
n_words
int64
2
6
freq
int64
15
432
beginning
stringlengths
4
33
1
6
22
I like to play with my
2
6
22
and then you put it in
3
6
21
but I don't know how to
4
6
19
when I grow up I want
5
6
17
I don't know how to get
6
6
17
but I don't know where the
7
6
17
and then put it in the
8
6
16
and then they went to the
9
6
16
and how I would do it
10
6
15
can I have a bit of
11
5
224
and then there was a
12
5
76
I don't know what it
13
5
73
I don't want you to
14
5
72
I wanna play with the
15
5
54
I don't know where it
16
5
53
I don't know what to
17
5
52
I wanna go to the
18
5
49
what do you do with
19
5
45
I want to play with
20
5
45
the boy and the dog
21
4
194
what is that funny
22
4
172
and this is a
23
4
161
how do you spell
24
4
151
do you want a
25
4
128
I think it's a
26
4
122
it looks like a
27
4
115
because I don't like
28
4
108
no I don't want
29
4
100
put it on the
30
4
93
what do you wanna
31
3
369
look at the
32
3
302
and that's the
33
3
292
I like the
34
3
251
is that the
35
3
233
that is a
36
3
225
it is a
37
3
185
a lot of
38
3
181
and I was
39
3
175
that's a big
40
3
169
what is it
41
2
432
to the
42
2
342
a baby
43
2
316
not that
44
2
236
another one
45
2
235
that's your
46
2
233
it a
47
2
224
where's your
48
2
217
take a
49
2
196
a red
50
2
192
do that
1
6
122
It is one of the most
2
6
106
It is interesting to note that
3
6
92
All you have to do is
4
6
91
The reason for this is that
5
6
91
This is due to the fact
6
6
90
Note that depending on the number
7
6
84
It can also be used to
8
6
77
This is one of the most
9
6
75
It should also be noted that
10
6
72
It is a good idea to
11
5
141
To learn more about the
12
5
104
The bottom line is that
13
5
102
It can be used to
14
5
98
At the same time the
15
5
96
There are three types of
16
5
92
For example, if you are
17
5
91
At the start of the
18
5
89
In the middle of the
19
5
88
This can be done by
20
5
84
What are the benefits of
21
4
143
However, there is a
22
4
133
This allows you to
23
4
118
While there is no
24
4
114
In recent years, the
25
4
108
That is why the
26
4
104
There are also some
27
4
102
In any case, the
28
4
102
In many cases, the
29
4
102
Thank you for your
30
4
98
In other words, a
31
3
180
I am a
32
3
176
In short, the
33
3
159
Learn about the
34
3
141
The system is
35
3
140
He said the
36
3
136
Many people have
37
3
135
Several of the
38
3
133
In conclusion, the
39
3
132
He became a
40
3
129
Because of these
41
2
166
The police
42
2
160
Using these
43
2
156
Get your
44
2
154
Eventually the
45
2
142
So to
46
2
140
Accordingly, the
47
2
139
Otherwise, the
48
2
135
This simple
49
2
135
Consider a
50
2
133
Since a

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.


language:

  • en ---+

This repository contains the lexical frames used to prompt the models in the frame completion task we introduced in Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMs (Bunzeck & Zarrieß @ CoNLL 2026).

If you use this data, please cite:

@inproceedings{bunzeck-zarriess-2026-child,
    title = "Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in {B}aby{LM}s",
    author = "Bunzeck, Bastian  and
      Zarrie{\ss}, Sina",
    editor = "Bonial, Claire  and
      Berzak, Yevgeni",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.conll-main.14/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.conll-main.14",
    pages = "227--249",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-410-1",
    abstract = "Recent studies suggest that child-directed speech is not conducive to language learning in BabyLMs. However, current evaluations focus predominantly on comprehension and not production, which is central to usage-based theories of language acquisition which argue how CDS facilitates early language use through constructional ``frames'' (frequent lexical patterns with open slots). We introduce a novel generation-based evaluation inspired by such theories in form of a \textbf{frame-completion task}, and compare Llama models trained with CDS, the BabyLM corpus, and web-crawl data (FineWeb-edu) on comprehension benchmarks and our novel framework. Our results reveal a clear dissociation between models' comprehension and production capabilities: while FineWeb-trained models excel at minimal pairs, CDS-trained models produce grammatical completions substantially earlier in training and concentrate probability mass on appropriate slot-fillers. These findings show that comprehension benchmarks underestimate what CDS affords to BabyLMs."
}
Downloads last month
18

Collection including bbunzeck/lexical-frames